TenantAtlas/specs/365-operations-ui-operator-actions-regression-gate/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 6ac0913ff8 feat: implement operations UI operator actions regression gate (#436)
Implemented operations UI operator actions regression gate.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #436
2026-06-08 01:21:14 +00:00

3.6 KiB

Requirements Quality Checklist: Spec 365

Feature: Operations UI Operator Actions & Regression Gate
Created: 2026-06-07
Purpose: Validate that Spec 365 prep artifacts are clear, bounded, testable, and aligned with repository truth before implementation.

Content Quality

  • No implementation details leak into the product problem statement beyond repo-seam constraints needed for safety.
  • User value and operator/customer impact are explicit.
  • Scope is bounded to existing Operations surfaces and existing OperationRun/Reconciliation truth.
  • Out-of-scope items explicitly exclude new adapters, generic retry framework, restore retry, force success, delete/purge, and new top-level pages.
  • Acceptance criteria are measurable.
  • Localization and raw leakage expectations are stated.
  • Filament v5 / Livewire v4 constraints are stated.

Requirement Completeness

  • Action eligibility resolver inputs and outputs are specified.
  • Reconcile action safety path is specified through existing registry/reconciler/service seams.
  • Retry is bounded to repo-verified safe non-high-risk seams and is unavailable otherwise.
  • High-risk restore/destructive guard is explicit.
  • Related domain object actions use canonical metadata and existing link/policy seams.
  • RBAC/capability and workspace/environment scope requirements are explicit.
  • Audit/action metadata required fields are explicit.
  • Outcome summary families and regression matrix states are explicit.
  • No raw technical leakage criteria are explicit.
  • No new top-level navigation/page sprawl criteria are explicit.
  • Mutation-scope disclosure is explicit for state-changing operator actions.

Constitution / Guardrail Alignment

  • UI Surface Impact is classified.
  • UI/Productization coverage decision is recorded.
  • Cross-cutting shared pattern reuse is described.
  • OperationRun UX Impact is filled.
  • Provider/platform boundary impact is bounded.
  • Operator surface contract, decision-first role, and audience-aware disclosure are filled.
  • Proportionality review is complete for the new resolver abstraction.
  • Testing/lane/runtime impact is complete.
  • Filament output contract is included.

Ambiguity and Deferrals

  • Generic retry ambiguity is resolved by fail-closed repo-verification rule.
  • Acknowledge ambiguity is resolved by optional/defer-if-no-clean-seam rule.
  • Capability ambiguity is resolved by "existing capability registry first, add minimal constants only if needed".
  • Report vs review-pack ambiguity is bounded to existing safe related metadata/link seams.
  • UI audit doc update ambiguity is assigned to implementation close-out.
  • Spec363 is included in the final Spec358-364 regression command set.
  • Denied action audit/log behavior is covered by implementation tasks.

Manual Prep Analysis Result

  • Result: PASS after prep adjustments.
  • Critical issues: none.
  • Non-critical implementation watch items:
    • Verify retry seams before exposing retry.
    • Verify whether acknowledge has a clean existing seam before implementing it.
    • Keep new resolver derived and non-persisted.
    • Ensure direct action tests cover denial, not only hidden UI.
    • Update or explicitly close out UI audit coverage artifacts.

Readiness

  • spec.md is ready for implementation planning.
  • plan.md defines implementation path and stop conditions.
  • tasks.md is dependency ordered and test-oriented.
  • Action eligibility matrix exists.
  • Regression gate matrix exists.
  • No application code was implemented during prep.