TenantAtlas/specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido be314c577f Spec 400: rebuild Tenantial homepage visuals (#387)
## Summary
- rebuild the public Tenantial homepage around an evidence-first Microsoft tenant governance narrative
- replace the old hero visual with a new static dashboard preview and add dedicated Trust Bar and Feature Pillars sections
- update the shared public shell, navigation, footer, dark design tokens, assets, and homepage content to match the new brand direction
- align website smoke coverage and Spec 400 artifacts with the rebuilt homepage

## Testing
- not run in this pass
- updated website smoke specs under apps/website/tests/smoke

## Note
- `website-dev` was pushed to `origin` so the requested PR base exists remotely
- the remote `website-dev` branch is an ancestor of `origin/dev`, so this PR may also show upstream `dev` history relative to that base

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #387
2026-05-18 14:38:11 +00:00

2.7 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Remove Findings Lifecycle Backfill Runtime Surfaces

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-28
Feature: specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No language/framework/API design leakage; concrete repo surfaces, commands, and labels are named only because this cleanup deletes those exact shipped traces.
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No unintended implementation design leakage remains beyond the explicit cleanup special-case for named repo-visible traces

Test Governance Review

  • Lane fit is explicit: the package uses fast-feedback and confidence, plus one retained heavy-governance guard in apps/platform/tests/Feature/OperationalControls/NoAdHocOperationalControlBypassTest.php so operational-control bypass residue cannot survive the cleanup silently.
  • No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; the retained guard stays explicit, bounded, and tied to operational-control source-trace removal only.
  • Suite-cost outcome is net-negative: backfill-only tests, lane traces, and helper residue are removed in the same slice instead of widening shared defaults.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • Workflow outcome: keep
  • Review-note location is explicit: the heavy-governance retention note lives in spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and the final preparation report.

Notes

  • The spec intentionally names concrete routes, commands, labels, and catalog keys because the product value of this slice is the removal of those specific repo-visible runtime surfaces.
  • The slice stays small by deleting visible repair tooling only; acknowledged-status cleanup and creation-time invariant hardening remain explicit follow-up candidates.
  • Validation pass complete: no clarification markers remain, LEAN-001 cleanup posture is explicit, and tenant-owned findings continue to treat workspace_id plus tenant_id as required anchors.