ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
website-dev
TenantAtlas/specs/255-enforce-finding-creation-invariants/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido be314c577f Spec 400: rebuild Tenantial homepage visuals (#387) 
## Summary
- rebuild the public Tenantial homepage around an evidence-first Microsoft tenant governance narrative
- replace the old hero visual with a new static dashboard preview and add dedicated Trust Bar and Feature Pillars sections
- update the shared public shell, navigation, footer, dark design tokens, assets, and homepage content to match the new brand direction
- align website smoke coverage and Spec 400 artifacts with the rebuilt homepage

## Testing
- not run in this pass
- updated website smoke specs under apps/website/tests/smoke

## Note
- `website-dev` was pushed to `origin` so the requested PR base exists remotely
- the remote `website-dev` branch is an ancestor of `origin/dev`, so this PR may also show upstream `dev` history relative to that base

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #387
2026-05-18 14:38:11 +00:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Enforce Creation-Time Finding Invariants

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-29
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • Repo-specific classes, routes, file paths, and validation commands appear only where they are required to keep the three active writer families and proof obligations unambiguous
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for product and review stakeholders, with repo-grounded detail only where the bounded invariant target would otherwise stay ambiguous
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria stay outcome-oriented even though the package names concrete writer families and proof files needed to bound the slice
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No unbounded implementation plan leaks into the specification; repo-specific commands and paths stay limited to selection, dependency, and validation context

Test Governance Review

  • Lane fit is explicit: the package uses fast-feedback and confidence, with the three writer suites as the primary proof and only bounded recurrence, consumer, and trigger-authorization regressions where FR-255-005, FR-255-006, FR-255-009, and FR-255-011 require them.
  • No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; adjacent proof remains inside existing feature suites only.
  • Suite-cost outcome stays bounded and reviewable: the package reuses existing writer, recurrence, consumer, and auth suites without adding a new default-heavy harness.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • Workflow outcome: keep
  • Review-note location is explicit: guardrail, lane-fit, and bounded-proof notes live in spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and this checklist.

Notes

  • Repo-surface names, validation commands, and current writer/test anchors are intentionally present because this prep package must distinguish the three active finding writers from already-completed adjacent cleanup specs.
  • The spec remains behavior-first: write-time lifecycle readiness, recurrence identity, reopen truth, and unchanged RBAC/tenant isolation are the product outcomes; repo details only keep the package reviewable and bounded.
  • No blocking open question remains for safe planning.