ahmido
acdea41d92
## Summary - add the localized review-pack product story routes at `/platform/review-packs` and `/en/platform/review-packs` with shared page composition, evidence/decision framing, audience sections, trust handoff, and footer/use-case/home/platform discovery - extend `site-copy`, smoke coverage, and Spec Kit artifacts for feature 408 so the public website contract, tests, research, plan, quickstart, and checklist stay aligned - polish the public presentation with a cleaner review-pack comparison surface, a more opaque navbar to remove homepage logo bleed-through, a higher-contrast secondary CTA, unique homepage feature icons, and less repetitive homepage use-case copy ## Validation - `corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website build` - `corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website test tests/smoke/public-routes.spec.ts` - `corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website test tests/smoke/interaction.spec.ts` - source/dist claim scans plus manual browser comprehension checks are recorded in `specs/408-review-evidence-decision/checklists/requirements.md` - current touched website files are free of editor diagnostics; live browser console check on the homepage returned no errors ## Notes - trust/proof messaging remains intentionally honest; this PR does not add fabricated customer logos, certifications, or unsupported compliance claims - `origin/website-dev` is the review base for this PR Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #405
41 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Customer-safe Review, Evidence & Decision Story
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-05-28
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Initial validation passed with no remaining clarification markers.
|
|
- The spec stays bounded to the public website and keeps `apps/platform` explicitly out of scope.
|
|
- Route selection remains intentionally flexible inside current IA, with `/platform/review-packs` recorded as the preferred destination.
|
|
- The spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|
|
- Implementation completed inside `apps/website/**` plus feature-spec artifacts only; `git diff --name-only -- apps/platform` returned no paths.
|
|
- Validation completed with `build`, full `public-routes` + `interaction` smoke suites, source/dist claim scans, and manual browser comprehension checks for both localized review-pack routes.
|
|
- Source and dist claim scans returned no matches after the final copy cleanup.
|
|
- Repo-wide `corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website format:check` still reports nine pre-existing, untouched formatting issues outside this feature slice; touched files pass `prettier --check`. |