ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
0856aeaa72
TenantAtlas/specs/090-action-surface-contract-compliance/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 90bfe1516e feat(spec-090): action surface contract compliance (#108) 
Implements Spec 090 (Action Surface Contract Compliance & RBAC Hardening).

Highlights:
- Adds/updates action surface declarations and shrinks baseline exemptions.
- Standardizes Filament action grouping/order and empty-state CTAs.
- Enforces RBAC UX semantics (non-member -> 404, member w/o capability -> disabled + tooltip, server-side 403).
- Adds audit logging for successful side-effect actions.
- Fixes Provider Connections list context so header create + row actions resolve tenant correctly.

Tests (focused):
- vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/090/
- vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php
- vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty

Livewire/Filament:
- Filament v5 + Livewire v4 compliant.
- No panel provider registration changes (Laravel 11+ registration remains in bootstrap/providers.php).

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #108
2026-02-13 01:30:22 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Action Surface Contract Compliance & RBAC Hardening

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-02-12 Feature: specs/090-action-surface-contract-compliance/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • All checks pass for planning readiness.
  • The spec includes governance-required references to "Filament Action Surfaces" only in the constitution alignment section; no code-level or framework-specific implementation guidance is provided.