TenantAtlas/specs/208-heavy-suite-segmentation/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 0d5d1fc9f4 Spec 208: finalize heavy suite segmentation (#241)
## Summary
- add the checked-in Spec 208 heavy-suite classification and family manifest with config-driven lane generation, attribution, and budget reporting
- update Pest grouping, guard coverage, wrapper/report contracts, and spec artifacts for the segmented lane model
- complete the targeted follow-up pass that re-homes the remaining in-scope confidence hotspots into explicit heavy-governance families

## Acceptance
- confidence is repaired and now measures 389.613832s, down from 587.446894s and below the 450s lane budget
- confidence is also slightly below the post-Spec-207 baseline of 394.383441s (delta -4.769609s)
- this closes the central Spec 208 acceptance issue that had kept the spec open

## Intentionally Re-homed Families
- finding-bulk-actions-workflow
- drift-bulk-triage-all-matching
- baseline-profile-start-surfaces
- workspace-settings-slice-management
- findings-workflow-surfaces
- workspace-only-admin-surface-independence

## Explicit Residual Risk
- heavy-governance now measures 318.296962s, above its documented 300s threshold
- the cost was not removed; it was moved into the correct lane and made visible on clearly named heavy families
- this is documented residual debt, not an open Spec 208 failure

## Validation
- focused guard/support validation: 206 passed (3607 assertions)
- lane wrapper/report validation completed for confidence and heavy-governance
- no full-suite run was performed in this pass by request

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #241
2026-04-17 09:53:55 +00:00

1.4 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Filament/Livewire Heavy Suite Segmentation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-16
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation completed in one pass on 2026-04-16.
  • Filament and Livewire are used as scope-defining names for the affected test families, not as implementation prescriptions.
  • The specification remains bounded to repository test-governance behavior and leaves CI wiring to the follow-up planning sequence.