ahmido
0e2adeab71
Implements Spec 084 (verification-surfaces-unification). Highlights - Unifies tenant + onboarding verification start on `provider.connection.check` (OperationRun-based, enqueue-only). - Ensures completed blocked runs persist a schema-valid `context.verification_report` stub (DB-only viewers never show “unavailable”). - Adds tenant embedded verification report widget with DB-only rendering + canonical tenantless “View run” links. - Enforces 404/403 semantics for tenantless run viewing (workspace membership + tenant entitlement required; otherwise 404). - Fixes admin panel widgets to resolve tenant from record context so Owners can start verification and recent operations renders correctly. Tests - Ran: `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Verification/ tests/Feature/ProviderConnections/ProviderOperationBlockedGuidanceSpec081Test.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/OnboardingVerificationTest.php tests/Feature/RunAuthorizationTenantIsolationTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantVerificationReportWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/RecentOperationsSummaryWidgetTest.php` Notes - Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compatible. - No new assets; no changes to provider registration. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@MacBookPro.fritz.box> Reviewed-on: #102
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Verification Surfaces Unification
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-02-09
|
|
**Feature**: [specs/084-verification-surfaces-unification/spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- The spec references “Filament” only to satisfy the required UI Action Matrix section; it does not prescribe implementation details beyond user-visible actions and authorization semantics.
|
|
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|