ahmido
17d3ca8313
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 45s
Implements support diagnostics bundle, moves audit writes to action mountUsing to avoid side-effects during render, replaces custom slide-over with Filament-native schema, updates tests and adds spec docs. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #278
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Support Diagnostic Pack
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-25
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated on 2026-04-25 against the repo template, constitution, and spec approval rubric.
|
|
- The first slice stays explicitly narrow: tenant context and OperationRun context only, derived references only, redaction and access checks first, no new support-pack persistence, and no external helpdesk or AI behavior. |