ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
196271ac01
TenantAtlas/specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/checklists/requirements.md
Ahmed Darrazi 196271ac01
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 59s
Details
test: add post-scope contract browser verification gate (340)
2026-05-31 16:22:35 +02:00

3.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 340 - Post-Scope Contract Browser Verification Gate

Purpose: Validate Spec 340 preparation completeness before implementation. Created: 2026-05-31 Feature: specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

  • CHK001 The selected candidate is directly provided by the user as Spec 340.
  • CHK002 Related existing specs were checked for completed-spec signals and are treated as context only.
  • CHK003 The package does not overwrite an existing specs/340-* directory.
  • CHK004 Close alternatives are deferred instead of hidden inside the primary scope.
  • CHK005 The candidate is narrowed to a browser/IA verification gate, not a new product feature.

Content Quality

  • CHK006 The spec has a concrete problem statement, user value, and primary operator/reviewer audience.
  • CHK007 The spec includes functional requirements, non-functional requirements, out-of-scope boundaries, assumptions, risks, and open questions.
  • CHK008 The spec avoids premature implementation details except where repo truth is needed for correctness.
  • CHK009 No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION], placeholder, or unresolved template marker remains.
  • CHK010 Acceptance criteria and success criteria are measurable enough for later implementation review.

Constitution And Scope

  • CHK011 The Spec Candidate Check is filled and scores above the approval threshold.
  • CHK012 The proportionality review states no new persisted truth, abstraction, runtime status family, or UI framework.
  • CHK013 Workspace/environment isolation, RBAC, Provider Connection authority, and audit/report evidence concerns are addressed.
  • CHK014 UI/Productization Coverage is handled as verification-only no-impact, with an explicit rule for updating artifacts before any runtime UI fix.
  • CHK015 Test governance identifies browser as the primary lane and keeps fixture/browser cost explicit.

Plan Quality

  • CHK016 plan.md identifies the likely repo surfaces to inspect without requiring runtime code changes.
  • CHK017 The plan distinguishes verification artifacts from optional runtime/test changes.
  • CHK018 The plan records Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture, provider registration no-change, global search no-change, destructive-action no-execution, and asset no-change.
  • CHK019 Deployment/ops impact is explicitly none unless a later bounded runtime fix changes code.
  • CHK020 Implementation phases are ordered from preflight to discovery, browser verification, findings, optional automation, and close-out.

Task Quality

  • CHK021 tasks.md exists and is ordered into small verification-first phases.
  • CHK022 Tasks include concrete file paths for artifacts and likely code surfaces.
  • CHK023 Tasks include browser setup, data availability, blocked-check handling, topbar semantics, Provider Connection authority, and go/no-go reporting.
  • CHK024 Tasks include validation commands and prevent destructive/external-provider action execution.
  • CHK025 Tasks explicitly forbid completed-spec rewrites and unrelated application implementation.

Spec Readiness Gate

  • CHK026 spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md exist.
  • CHK027 No open question blocks safe implementation.
  • CHK028 The scope is small enough for a bounded implementation loop.
  • CHK029 Required checklist artifact exists.
  • CHK030 Result: ready for implementation loop as a verification-only package.