ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
1c291fb9fe
TenantAtlas/specs/195-action-surface-closure/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 1c291fb9fe feat: close spec 195 action surface residuals (#230) 
## Summary
- add the full Spec 195 residual action-surface design package under `specs/195-action-surface-closure`
- implement residual surface inventory and validator enforcement for uncatalogued system and special Filament pages
- add focused regression coverage for residual guards, system directory pages, managed-tenants landing, and readonly register-tenant / tenant-dashboard access
- fix the system workspace detail surface by loading tenant route keys and disabling lazy system database notifications to avoid the Livewire 404 on `/system/directory/workspaces/{workspace}`

## Testing
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec195/SystemDirectoryResidualSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/DatabaseNotificationsPollingTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- branch: `195-action-surface-closure`
- target: `dev`
- no new assets, migrations, or provider-registration changes

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #230
2026-04-13 07:47:58 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Action Surface Enforcement, Enrollment, and Exception Closure

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-12
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated on first pass against the spec template and closure requirements.
  • No open clarification markers remain.
  • The spec stays bounded to residual closure, discovery limits, exemptions, and regression protection after Specs 192 to 194.