ahmido
d2f2c55ead
## Summary - add canonical onboarding lifecycle and checkpoint fields plus optimistic locking versioning for managed tenant onboarding drafts - introduce centralized onboarding lifecycle and mutation services and route wizard mutations through version-checked writes - convert Verify Access and Bootstrap into live checkpoint-driven wizard states with conditional polling and updated browser/feature/unit coverage - add Spec Kit artifacts for feature 140, including spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, quickstart, checklist, and logical contract ## Validation - branch was committed and pushed cleanly - focused tests and formatting were updated during implementation work - full validation was not re-run as part of this final git/PR step ## Notes - base branch: `dev` - feature branch: `140-onboarding-lifecycle-operation-checkpoints-concurrency-mvp` - outstanding follow-up items, if any, remain tracked in `specs/140-onboarding-lifecycle-operation-checkpoints-concurrency-mvp/tasks.md` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #169
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Onboarding Lifecycle, Operation Checkpoints & Concurrency MVP
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-14
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Architectural constraints are intentionally described at the workflow level because this repository's constitution requires explicit lifecycle, operation, authorization, and Filament-surface alignment in feature specs. |