ahmido
c17255f854
## Summary - add the structured subject-resolution foundation for baseline compare and baseline capture, including capability guards, subject descriptors, resolution outcomes, and operator action categories - persist structured evidence-gap subject records and update compare/capture surfaces, landing projections, and cleanup tooling to use the new contract - add Spec 163 artifacts and focused Pest coverage for classification, determinism, cleanup, and DB-only rendering ## Validation - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Support/Baselines tests/Feature/Baselines tests/Feature/Filament/OperationRunEnterpriseDetailPageTest.php` ## Notes - verified locally that a fresh post-restart baseline compare run now writes structured `baseline_compare.evidence_gaps.subjects` records instead of the legacy broad payload shape - excluded the separate `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` worktree change from this branch commit and PR Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #193
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Subject Resolution and Evidence Gap Semantics Foundation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-24
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/163-baseline-subject-resolution/spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated on first pass.
|
|
- The spec intentionally establishes root-cause and runtime-support semantics only; fidelity richness, renderer density, and wording refinement remain deferred follow-on work. |