- StoredReports foundation (generic table, polymorphic report_type) - Permission Posture Findings generation (fingerprint-based, auto-resolve) - Alerts integration (EVENT_PERMISSION_MISSING event type) - Posture score calculation (0-100 normalized) - 18 functional requirements, 7 success criteria - 4 user stories (P1-P3), 5 edge cases - Full constitution alignment documented - Quality checklist: all items pass
2.1 KiB
2.1 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Provider Permission Posture
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-02-26 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Constitution Alignment
- Constitution alignment (required) -- contract registry, safety gates, tenant isolation, run observability, tests
- Constitution alignment (RBAC-UX) -- authorization planes, 404/403 semantics, capability registry
- Constitution alignment (OPS-EX-AUTH-001) -- not applicable, documented
- Constitution alignment (BADGE-001) -- new badge values documented, centralized map extended
- Constitution alignment (Filament Action Surfaces) -- exemption documented (no new surfaces)
- Constitution alignment (UX-001) -- exemption documented (no new screens)
Notes
- All checklist items pass. Spec is ready for
/speckit.clarifyor/speckit.plan. - No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers; all decisions were made with informed defaults based on codebase research (Q1-Q6) and architectural decision validation from prior conversation.
- Key informed defaults documented in Assumptions section: TenantPermissionService as data source, DriftFindingGenerator pattern for idempotent upsert, Alerts v1 generic framework for new event types.