TenantAtlas/specs/110-ops-ux-enforcement/checklists/requirements.md
2026-02-23 22:48:30 +01:00

38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Specification Quality Checklist: Ops-UX Enforcement & Cleanup (Enterprise Standard Rollout)
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-02-23
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
## Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- All items pass.
- Spec includes the mandatory UI Action Matrix and explicitly states “no new screens” while allowing targeted start-surface cleanup.
- Remediation targets are enumerated in the specs “Known Violations” tables; the executable task list is the single source of truth in `tasks.md`.
- Guard tests (FR-012) are specced as static analysis (filesystem scan) with explicit allowlist, so they fail fast with actionable output.