ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
29ad8852ca
TenantAtlas/specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 29ad8852ca
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 1m1s
Details
merge: platform-dev into dev (#295) 
## Summary
- integrate the current `platform-dev` branch into `dev`
- bring the latest platform work from the integration branch into the main development branch
- include the recent findings lifecycle backfill removal slice together with the already accumulated `platform-dev` changes

## Scope
- source branch: `platform-dev`
- target branch: `dev`
- branch role: integration PR, not a single-feature PR

## Validation
- branch state reviewed before PR creation
- `platform-dev` is ahead of `dev` with the expected integration history
- this PR intentionally carries the accumulated `platform-dev` commits into `dev`

## Notes
- this is the correct merge direction for the current workflow, where feature branches land in `platform-dev` first and `platform-dev` is then merged into `dev`
- after merging, `platform-dev` can be recreated fresh from `dev` as usual

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #295
2026-04-28 22:11:20 +00:00

2.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Remove Findings Lifecycle Backfill Runtime Surfaces

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-28
Feature: specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No language/framework/API design leakage; concrete repo surfaces, commands, and labels are named only because this cleanup deletes those exact shipped traces.
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No unintended implementation design leakage remains beyond the explicit cleanup special-case for named repo-visible traces

Test Governance Review

  • Lane fit is explicit: the package uses fast-feedback and confidence, plus one retained heavy-governance guard in apps/platform/tests/Feature/OperationalControls/NoAdHocOperationalControlBypassTest.php so operational-control bypass residue cannot survive the cleanup silently.
  • No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; the retained guard stays explicit, bounded, and tied to operational-control source-trace removal only.
  • Suite-cost outcome is net-negative: backfill-only tests, lane traces, and helper residue are removed in the same slice instead of widening shared defaults.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • Workflow outcome: keep
  • Review-note location is explicit: the heavy-governance retention note lives in spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and the final preparation report.

Notes

  • The spec intentionally names concrete routes, commands, labels, and catalog keys because the product value of this slice is the removal of those specific repo-visible runtime surfaces.
  • The slice stays small by deleting visible repair tooling only; acknowledged-status cleanup and creation-time invariant hardening remain explicit follow-up candidates.
  • Validation pass complete: no clarification markers remain, LEAN-001 cleanup posture is explicit, and tenant-owned findings continue to treat workspace_id plus tenant_id as required anchors.