72 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
72 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Quality Checklist: Spec 365
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: Operations UI Operator Actions & Regression Gate
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-07
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate that Spec 365 prep artifacts are clear, bounded, testable, and aligned with repository truth before implementation.
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into the product problem statement beyond repo-seam constraints needed for safety.
|
|
- [x] User value and operator/customer impact are explicit.
|
|
- [x] Scope is bounded to existing Operations surfaces and existing OperationRun/Reconciliation truth.
|
|
- [x] Out-of-scope items explicitly exclude new adapters, generic retry framework, restore retry, force success, delete/purge, and new top-level pages.
|
|
- [x] Acceptance criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] Localization and raw leakage expectations are stated.
|
|
- [x] Filament v5 / Livewire v4 constraints are stated.
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Action eligibility resolver inputs and outputs are specified.
|
|
- [x] Reconcile action safety path is specified through existing registry/reconciler/service seams.
|
|
- [x] Retry is bounded to repo-verified safe non-high-risk seams and is unavailable otherwise.
|
|
- [x] High-risk restore/destructive guard is explicit.
|
|
- [x] Related domain object actions use canonical metadata and existing link/policy seams.
|
|
- [x] RBAC/capability and workspace/environment scope requirements are explicit.
|
|
- [x] Audit/action metadata required fields are explicit.
|
|
- [x] Outcome summary families and regression matrix states are explicit.
|
|
- [x] No raw technical leakage criteria are explicit.
|
|
- [x] No new top-level navigation/page sprawl criteria are explicit.
|
|
- [x] Mutation-scope disclosure is explicit for state-changing operator actions.
|
|
|
|
## Constitution / Guardrail Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] UI Surface Impact is classified.
|
|
- [x] UI/Productization coverage decision is recorded.
|
|
- [x] Cross-cutting shared pattern reuse is described.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun UX Impact is filled.
|
|
- [x] Provider/platform boundary impact is bounded.
|
|
- [x] Operator surface contract, decision-first role, and audience-aware disclosure are filled.
|
|
- [x] Proportionality review is complete for the new resolver abstraction.
|
|
- [x] Testing/lane/runtime impact is complete.
|
|
- [x] Filament output contract is included.
|
|
|
|
## Ambiguity and Deferrals
|
|
|
|
- [x] Generic retry ambiguity is resolved by fail-closed repo-verification rule.
|
|
- [x] Acknowledge ambiguity is resolved by optional/defer-if-no-clean-seam rule.
|
|
- [x] Capability ambiguity is resolved by "existing capability registry first, add minimal constants only if needed".
|
|
- [x] Report vs review-pack ambiguity is bounded to existing safe related metadata/link seams.
|
|
- [x] UI audit doc update ambiguity is assigned to implementation close-out.
|
|
- [x] Spec363 is included in the final Spec358-364 regression command set.
|
|
- [x] Denied action audit/log behavior is covered by implementation tasks.
|
|
|
|
## Manual Prep Analysis Result
|
|
|
|
- **Result**: PASS after prep adjustments.
|
|
- **Critical issues**: none.
|
|
- **Non-critical implementation watch items**:
|
|
- Verify retry seams before exposing retry.
|
|
- Verify whether acknowledge has a clean existing seam before implementing it.
|
|
- Keep new resolver derived and non-persisted.
|
|
- Ensure direct action tests cover denial, not only hidden UI.
|
|
- Update or explicitly close out UI audit coverage artifacts.
|
|
|
|
## Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] `spec.md` is ready for implementation planning.
|
|
- [x] `plan.md` defines implementation path and stop conditions.
|
|
- [x] `tasks.md` is dependency ordered and test-oriented.
|
|
- [x] Action eligibility matrix exists.
|
|
- [x] Regression gate matrix exists.
|
|
- [x] No application code was implemented during prep.
|