ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
2fa8fc0f87
TenantAtlas/specs/251-commercial-entitlements-billing-state/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 2fa8fc0f87
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 51s
Details
refactor: remove findings lifecycle backfill runtime surfaces (#294) 
## Summary
- decommission the legacy findings lifecycle backfill substrate across command, job, service, and UI layers
- remove related platform capabilities, operation catalog entries, and action surface exemptions
- add regression and removal verification tests to ensure runtime integrity and surface absence
- include spec, plan, tasks, and data-model artifacts for the removal slice

## Scope
- active spec: specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces
- target branch: dev

## Validation
- integrated regression and removal verification tests for console, findings, and system ops surfaces
- audit log and capability trace verification for the removal path

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #294
2026-04-28 22:00:51 +00:00

1.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Commercial Entitlements and Billing-State Maturity

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and readiness before planning or implementation. Created: 2026-04-28 Feature: ../spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • Workflow outcome: keep
  • Test-governance impact is explicitly recorded in the spec

Notes

  • Repo-specific surface names and existing product terms are used to anchor the spec to current truth, but the spec does not prescribe languages, frameworks, APIs, or low-level implementation design.
  • No open clarification markers remain. The bounded assumptions are the default active_paid resolution for unset workspaces and the distinct grace behavior that freezes onboarding expansion without blocking in-scope review-pack starts.
  • Implementation close-out keeps the workflow outcome as keep. The Livewire browser-smoke finding was fixed inside scope by making workspace route resolution accept Livewire serialized workspace parameters; no follow-up spec is required.