ahmido
37c6d0622c
## Summary - implement the Action Surface Contract v1.1 runtime changes for Spec 169 - add the new explicit ActionSurfaceType contract, validator/discovery updates, and enrolled surface declarations - update Filament action-surface documentation, focused guard tests, and spec artifacts for the completed feature ## Included - clickable-row vs explicit-inspect enforcement across monitoring, reporting, CRUD, and system reference surfaces - helper-first, workflow-next, destructive-last overflow ordering checks - system panel list discovery in the primary action-surface validator - Spec 169 artifacts: spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, quickstart, and logical contract ## Verification - focused Pest verification pack completed for: - tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceValidatorTest.php - tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php - tests/Feature/Rbac/TenantActionSurfaceConsistencyTest.php - integrated browser smoke test completed for admin-side reference surfaces: - /admin/operations - /admin/audit-log - /admin/finding-exceptions/queue - /admin/reviews - /admin/tenants ## Notes - system panel browser smoke coverage could not be exercised in the same session because /system routes require platform authentication in the integrated browser - Livewire target remains v4-compliant and no provider registration or asset strategy changes are introduced by this PR Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #200
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Action Surface Contract v1.1: Inspect Decision Rules, Menu Ordering, and Behavior Guard Coverage
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-30
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated against the active Spec Kit template, constitution retrofit priorities, and current repository state.
|
|
- System-panel enrollment and relation-manager rollout work were treated as completed current-state evidence, so this spec stays bounded to the remaining foundation-and-enforcement gap.
|