TenantAtlas/specs/407-full-browser-ux-runtime-audit/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 3a0fc6c5c4 spec: add full browser UX runtime audit spec (#478)
Automated PR provided by Codex via Gitea API.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #478
2026-06-24 12:28:23 +00:00

5.1 KiB

Requirements Checklist: Spec 407 - Full Browser/UX Runtime Audit

Feature: specs/407-full-browser-ux-runtime-audit/ Review date: 2026-06-24 Scope: Preparation artifact quality only. No application implementation performed.

Candidate Selection Gate

  • The selected candidate was directly provided by the operator as Spec 407.
  • docs/product/spec-candidates.md was reviewed and reports no safe automatic next-best-prep target.
  • The candidate aligns with the supplied after-Specs-400-406 browser/runtime gate.
  • The roadmap supports a broad readiness gate before pilot/customer-facing claims.
  • Specs 400-406 are treated as read-only lineage.
  • Spec 403 PASS, Spec 404/405 PASS WITH CONDITIONS, and Spec 406 PASS WITH CONDITIONS are carried forward honestly.
  • No existing specs/407-full-browser-ux-runtime-audit/ package existed before preparation.
  • Existing branch 407-msp-mittelstand-use-case-pages is recorded as unrelated.
  • The smallest slice is a read-only browser/runtime audit and final readiness report.
  • Close alternatives are deferred instead of hidden inside this package.
  • Candidate Selection Gate result: PASS as a direct operator-promoted follow-through candidate.

Spec Completeness

  • Problem statement is clear and product-oriented.
  • Business/product value is explicit.
  • Primary users/operators are named.
  • Scope fields cover routes/surfaces, ownership, RBAC, and leakage checks.
  • Functional requirements are testable.
  • Non-functional requirements cover security, reliability, auditability, performance, product safety, and test governance.
  • User stories include independent tests and acceptance criteria.
  • Edge cases are documented.
  • Out-of-scope boundaries forbid fixes, runtime changes, tests, fixtures, destructive actions, saved docs by default, and completed-spec rewrites.
  • Success criteria are measurable.
  • Assumptions, risks, and open questions are explicit.

Constitution And Proportionality

  • Spec Candidate Check is filled out.
  • Approval class is exactly one class: Core Enterprise.
  • Score is recorded and above the minimum threshold.
  • Proportionality Review is completed.
  • The report/matrix/severity outputs are explicitly report-only and not runtime truth.
  • No persisted entity, table, enum, status family, abstraction, UI framework, or product taxonomy is approved.
  • The spec requires stopping before implementation or product-decision invention.
  • Completed historical specs are preserved as read-only context.

Product Surface Contract

  • docs/product/standards/product-surface-contract.md is referenced.
  • No-legacy posture is recorded.
  • UI Surface Impact is No UI surface impact with rationale.
  • Product Surface Impact is completed as audit-only.
  • Page archetypes, surface budgets, deep-link demotion, and canonical vocabulary are audit criteria.
  • Browser proof is required as the audit output.
  • Human Product Sanity is required for the final report.
  • Product Surface exceptions are none for preparation.
  • Final report close-out fields are required.

Plan Completeness

  • Plan identifies PHP/Laravel/Filament/Livewire/Pest/PostgreSQL/Sail context.
  • Plan names existing runtime surfaces likely inspected.
  • Plan distinguishes read-only browser audit from runtime implementation.
  • Plan includes UI/Product Surface, Filament/Livewire/deployment, RBAC, audit, evidence/currentness, OperationRun, lifecycle, and test-governance posture.
  • Plan defines audit method, output strategy, stop conditions, phases, and risk controls.
  • Plan carries Spec 404/405 and Spec 406 conditions forward.
  • Plan does not contradict repository architecture or current code truth.

Task Completeness

  • Tasks are ordered by safety, inventory, browser walkthrough, journey matrix, findings, summaries, readiness decision, and close-out.
  • Tasks are small and verifiable.
  • Tasks include dirty-state checks before/after.
  • Tasks include actor/fixture availability checks.
  • Tasks include required surface and journey coverage.
  • Tasks include severity/category finding classification.
  • Tasks include Product Surface and Filament output-contract close-out fields.
  • Tasks include explicit non-goals preventing implementation and mutation.
  • Tasks include final validation commands and no-implementation proof.

Open Questions And Readiness

  • No open question blocks starting the audit; unavailable actors, fixtures, services, or routes are recorded as limitations.
  • Saved audit artifact policy is explicit: response-only by default, spec-local file only by operator request.
  • Spec Readiness Gate result: PASS for implementation preparation.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case for a broad but read-only customer-readiness browser audit gate.
  • Workflow outcome: keep.
  • Final note location: future Spec 407 final audit report.
  • No application implementation was performed during preparation.