ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
3a2a06e8d7
TenantAtlas/specs/173-tenant-dashboard-truth-alignment/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 3a2a06e8d7 feat: align tenant dashboard truth surfaces (#204) 
## Summary
- align tenant dashboard KPI, attention, compare, and operations truth so the page does not read calmer than the tenant's actual state
- preserve tenant-safe drill-through continuity into findings, baseline compare, and canonical operations, including disabled helper states for permission-limited members
- add the Spec 173 artifact set and focused regression coverage for dashboard truth alignment and drill-through behavior

## Validation
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/DashboardKpisWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantDashboardTruthAlignmentTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationsDashboardDrillthroughTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/NeedsAttentionWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareNowWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineCompareSummaryConsistencyTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsListDefaultsTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsListFiltersTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingAdminTenantParityTest.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/CanonicalViewRunLinksTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantDashboardTenantScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantDashboardDbOnlyTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TableStandardsBaselineTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TableDetailVisibilityTest.php`
- integrated browser smoke on the tenant dashboard, including a permission-limited member scenario

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #204
2026-04-03 20:26:15 +00:00

1.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Dashboard KPI & Attention Truth Alignment

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-03
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass 1: complete.
  • The spec stays bounded to the existing tenant dashboard surface family and explicitly rejects a new global tenant-posture component or persisted dashboard aggregate.
  • The main validation focus was keeping tenant-level KPI, attention, compare, and recent surfaces aligned around the same tenant truth while preserving clear separation between posture, activity, and recency.