ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
3c3daae405
TenantAtlas/specs/156-operator-outcome-taxonomy/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 3c3daae405 feat: normalize operator outcome taxonomy (#186) 
## Summary
- introduce a shared operator outcome taxonomy with semantic axes, severity bands, and next-action policy
- apply the taxonomy to operations, evidence/review completeness, baseline semantics, and restore semantics
- harden badge rendering, tenant-safe filtering/search behavior, and operator-facing summary/notification wording
- add the spec kit artifacts, reference documentation, and regression coverage for diagnostic-vs-primary state handling

## Testing
- focused Pest coverage for taxonomy registry and badge guardrails
- operations presentation and notification tests
- evidence, baseline, restore, and tenant-scope regression tests

## Notes
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved in the existing Filament v5 stack
- panel provider registration remains unchanged in bootstrap/providers.php
- no new globally searchable resource was added; adopted resources remain tenant-safe and out of global search where required
- no new destructive action family was introduced; existing actions keep their current authorization and confirmation behavior
- no new frontend asset strategy was introduced; existing deploy flow with filament:assets remains unchanged

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #186
2026-03-22 12:13:34 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Operator Outcome Taxonomy and Cross-Domain State Separation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-21
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed against the initial draft.
  • Strategic selection rationale is captured in the spec's final direction: this candidate is the recommended first step of the operator-truth initiative because downstream candidates depend on a shared vocabulary.