1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Finding Governance Health & Resolution Semantics Surface Hardening
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-27
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No code-level implementation mechanics (new classes, schema, jobs, or algorithms) are prescribed
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for product, design, and implementation stakeholders in repo-native spec language
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No code-level implementation mechanics leak into the specification beyond required route, RBAC, operator-surface contract detail, and UI Action Matrix location references
Notes
- Validation pass 1 completed against the finished spec.
- No open clarification markers remain.
- Proportionality review completed: the spec explicitly records that it adds no new source of truth, persistence, abstraction, state family, or cross-domain taxonomy.
- The spec intentionally references existing route surfaces and shared semantic primitives because this repo's spec template requires operator-surface and constitution alignment details; it does not prescribe implementation mechanics.