TenantAtlas/.specify/templates/spec-template.md
ahmido cfbc74c035 docs: consolidate RBAC-UX standards into constitution v1.6.0 (#80)
## Summary
<!-- Kurz: Was ändert sich und warum? -->

## Spec-Driven Development (SDD)
- [ ] Es gibt eine Spec unter `specs/<NNN>-<feature>/`
- [ ] Enthaltene Dateien: `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `spec.md`
- [ ] Spec beschreibt Verhalten/Acceptance Criteria (nicht nur Implementation)
- [ ] Wenn sich Anforderungen während der Umsetzung geändert haben: Spec/Plan/Tasks wurden aktualisiert

## Implementation
- [ ] Implementierung entspricht der Spec
- [ ] Edge cases / Fehlerfälle berücksichtigt
- [ ] Keine unbeabsichtigten Änderungen außerhalb des Scopes

## Tests
- [ ] Tests ergänzt/aktualisiert (Pest/PHPUnit)
- [ ] Relevante Tests lokal ausgeführt (`./vendor/bin/sail artisan test` oder `php artisan test`)

## Migration / Config / Ops (falls relevant)
- [ ] Migration(en) enthalten und getestet
- [ ] Rollback bedacht (rückwärts kompatibel, sichere Migration)
- [ ] Neue Env Vars dokumentiert (`.env.example` / Doku)
- [ ] Queue/cron/storage Auswirkungen geprüft

## UI (Filament/Livewire) (falls relevant)
- [ ] UI-Flows geprüft
- [ ] Screenshots/Notizen hinzugefügt

## Notes
<!-- Links, Screenshots, Follow-ups, offene Punkte -->

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@MacBookPro.fritz.box>
Reviewed-on: #80
2026-01-28 22:04:17 +00:00

5.8 KiB

Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]

Feature Branch: [###-feature-name]
Created: [DATE]
Status: Draft
Input: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"

User Scenarios & Testing (mandatory)

User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)

[Describe this user journey in plain language]

Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]

Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]

Acceptance Scenarios:

  1. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
  2. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]

User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)

[Describe this user journey in plain language]

Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]

Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently]

Acceptance Scenarios:

  1. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]

User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)

[Describe this user journey in plain language]

Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]

Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently]

Acceptance Scenarios:

  1. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]

[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]

Edge Cases

  • What happens when [boundary condition]?
  • How does system handle [error scenario]?

Requirements (mandatory)

Constitution alignment (required): If this feature introduces any Microsoft Graph calls, any write/change behavior, or any long-running/queued/scheduled work, the spec MUST describe contract registry updates, safety gates (preview/confirmation/audit), tenant isolation, run observability (OperationRun type/identity/visibility), and tests. If security-relevant DB-only actions intentionally skip OperationRun, the spec MUST describe AuditLog entries.

Constitution alignment (RBAC-UX): If this feature introduces or changes authorization behavior, the spec MUST:

  • state which authorization plane(s) are involved (tenant /admin/t/{tenant} vs platform /system),
  • ensure any cross-plane access is deny-as-not-found (404),
  • explicitly define 404 vs 403 semantics:
    • non-member / not entitled to tenant scope → 404 (deny-as-not-found)
    • member but missing capability → 403
  • describe how authorization is enforced server-side (Gates/Policies) for every mutation/operation-start/credential change,
  • reference the canonical capability registry (no raw capability strings; no role-string checks in feature code),
  • ensure global search is tenant-scoped and non-member-safe (no hints; inaccessible results treated as 404 semantics),
  • ensure destructive-like actions require confirmation (->requiresConfirmation()),
  • include at least one positive and one negative authorization test, and note any RBAC regression tests added/updated.

Constitution alignment (OPS-EX-AUTH-001): OIDC/SAML login handshakes may perform synchronous outbound HTTP (e.g., token exchange) on /auth/* endpoints without an OperationRun. This MUST NOT be used for Monitoring/Operations pages.

Constitution alignment (BADGE-001): If this feature changes status-like badges (status/outcome/severity/risk/availability/boolean), the spec MUST describe how badge semantics stay centralized (no ad-hoc mappings) and which tests cover any new/changed values.

Functional Requirements

  • FR-001: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
  • FR-002: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
  • FR-003: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
  • FR-004: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
  • FR-005: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]

Example of marking unclear requirements:

  • FR-006: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
  • FR-007: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]

Key Entities (include if feature involves data)

  • [Entity 1]: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
  • [Entity 2]: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]

Success Criteria (mandatory)

Measurable Outcomes

  • SC-001: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
  • SC-002: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
  • SC-003: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
  • SC-004: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]