ahmido
3bdd27f747
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 43s
## Summary - consolidate workspace and tenant shell resolution behind a canonical resolved shell context - align workspace switching, tenant selection, and tenant clearing with the new recovery and fallback rules - add focused Pest coverage for shell resolution and update root dev orchestration so platform Vite starts correctly from repo-root commands ## Testing - cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Monitoring/HeaderContextBarTest.php - cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Workspaces/GlobalContextShellContractTest.php - manual integrated-browser smoke for tenant-bound shell actions and context recovery flows - validated corepack pnpm build:platform, corepack pnpm dev:platform, corepack pnpm dev:website, and corepack pnpm dev ## Notes - Livewire v4 / Filament v5 remain unchanged and provider registration stays in bootstrap/providers.php - no new globally searchable resources or destructive Filament actions were introduced Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #246
37 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Global Context Shell Contract
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-18
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Specification reviewed against the repo spec template and constitution prompts on 2026-04-18.
|
|
- No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain.
|
|
- Route and shell-surface references are included only to bound the affected product surfaces and do not prescribe implementation structure.
|