TenantAtlas/specs/408-review-evidence-decision/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Customer-safe Review, Evidence & Decision Story

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-05-28
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
• Focused on user value and business needs
• Written for non-technical stakeholders
• All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Success criteria are measurable
• Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
• All acceptance scenarios are defined
• Edge cases are identified
• Scope is clearly bounded
• Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• User scenarios cover primary flows
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

• Initial validation passed with no remaining clarification markers.
• The spec stays bounded to the public website and keeps apps/platform explicitly out of scope.
• Route selection remains intentionally flexible inside current IA, with /platform/review-packs recorded as the preferred destination.
• The spec is ready for /speckit.plan.
• Implementation completed inside apps/website/** plus feature-spec artifacts only; git diff --name-only -- apps/platform returned no paths.
• Validation completed with build, full public-routes + interaction smoke suites, source/dist claim scans, and manual browser comprehension checks for both localized review-pack routes.
• Source and dist claim scans returned no matches after the final copy cleanup.
• Repo-wide corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website format:check still reports nine pre-existing, untouched formatting issues outside this feature slice; touched files pass prettier --check.