1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Operations Lifecycle Alignment & Cross-Surface Truth Consistency
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-05
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validated after the initial draft. The spec stays focused on operator trust, cross-surface truth alignment, and drill-through continuity while explicitly avoiding new persistence or a lifecycle-model rewrite.
- The only new semantic split is a derived operator-facing distinction between terminal follow-up and active stale or stuck attention, built from existing lifecycle truth rather than new stored state.
- No clarification markers remain. Scope, non-goals, dependencies, and measurable outcomes are explicit enough to proceed to planning.