2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Workspace Chooser v1 (Enterprise)
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-02-22 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Note: Spec references existing codebase components by name for context (WorkspaceContext, AuditActionId) but requirements are behavior-focused. Framework names appear in UI Action Matrix as required by template.
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders (user stories are plain language)
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified (zero memberships, archived workspace, stale session, forced chooser)
- Scope is clearly bounded (v1 vs v2 backlog explicit)
- Dependencies and assumptions identified (existing infrastructure documented in Context section)
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows (auto-resume single, auto-resume last-used, chooser fallback, revoked membership, manual switch, audit)
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification (behavior-first language throughout)
Constitution Alignment
- RBAC-UX: authorization plane stated (workspace /admin scope)
- RBAC-UX: 404 vs 403 semantics defined (non-member → 404)
- RBAC-UX: server-side enforcement described (middleware)
- RBAC-UX: capability registry referenced (Capabilities::WORKSPACE_MANAGE)
- Audit: audit events defined with payloads
- UX-001: exemption documented (context selector, not CRUD page)
- UI Action Matrix completed
Notes
- Spec deliberately uses
users.last_workspace_id(existing column) instead of proposing a newuser_preferencestable, aligning with current codebase patterns. - Middleware algorithm is specified in detail because it's the core business logic of the feature; still expressed as behavior rules, not code.
- All items pass. Spec is ready for
/speckit.plan.