ahmido
45a804970e
## Summary - complete Spec 136 canonical admin tenant rollout across admin-visible and shared Filament surfaces - add the shared panel-aware tenant resolver helper, persisted filter-state synchronization, and admin navigation segregation for tenant-sensitive resources - expand regression, guard, and parity coverage for admin-path tenant resolution, stale filters, workspace-wide tenant-default surfaces, and panel split behavior ## Validation - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/AdminTenantResolverGuardTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/TableStatePersistenceTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter='CanonicalAdminTenantFilterState|PolicyResource|BackupSchedule|BackupSet|FindingResource|BaselineCompareLanding|RestoreRunResource|InventoryItemResource|PolicyVersionResource|ProviderConnectionResource|TenantDiagnostics|InventoryCoverage|InventoryKpiHeader|AuditLog|EntraGroup'` - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved with Filament v5. - Provider registration remains unchanged in `bootstrap/providers.php`. - `PolicyResource` and `PolicyVersionResource` have admin global search disabled explicitly; `EntraGroupResource` keeps admin-aware scoped search with a View page. - Destructive and governance-sensitive actions retain existing confirmation and authorization behavior while using canonical tenant parity. - No new assets were introduced, so deployment asset strategy is unchanged and does not add new `filament:assets` work. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #165
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Admin Panel Canonical Tenant Resolution Full Rollout
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-11
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed on 2026-03-11.
|
|
- No unresolved clarification markers remain.
|
|
- Product-specific source-of-truth names are retained only where they define the required tenant-resolution rule and panel separation for this feature.
|
|
- Spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`. |