ahmido
53e799fea7
## Summary - add Spec 185 workspace recovery posture visibility artifacts under `specs/185-workspace-recovery-posture-visibility` - promote tenant backup health and recovery evidence onto the workspace overview with separate metrics, attention ordering, calmness coverage, and tenant-dashboard drill-throughs - batch visible-tenant backup/recovery derivation to keep the workspace overview query-bounded - align follow-up fixes from the authoritative suite rerun, including dashboard truth-alignment fixtures, canonical backup schedule tenant context, guard-path cleanup, smoke-fixture credential removal, and robust theme asset manifest handling ## Testing - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Filament/PanelThemeAssetTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/DerivedStateConsumerAdoptionGuardTest.php` - focused regression pack for the previously failing cases passed - full suite JUnit run passed: `3401` tests, `18849` assertions, `0` failures, `0` errors, `8` skips ## Notes - no new schema or persisted workspace recovery model - no provider-registration changes; Filament/Livewire stack remains on Filament v5 and Livewire v4 - no new destructive actions or global search changes Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #216
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Workspace Recovery Posture Visibility
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-09
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation completed on 2026-04-09.
|
|
- The spec keeps workspace claims explicitly bounded to visible tenants and existing tenant-level backup and recovery truth.
|
|
- No clarification round is required before `/speckit.plan`. |