ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
548a37c888
TenantAtlas/specs/333-restore-create-ux-final-productization/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 1e45a29937 feat: finalize restore create ux productization (#403) 
## Summary
- finalize the restore create wizard productization across safety, validation, preview, and confirmation steps
- refine the restore presenter output and Blade component rendering for clearer proof, scope, resolver, and execution-readiness states
- add and update feature and browser coverage plus Spec 333 artifacts and screenshots

## Testing
- Not run as part of this commit/PR task

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #403
2026-05-28 22:04:32 +00:00

2.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 333 - Restore Create UX Final Productization

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation planning and execution. Created: 2026-05-26 Feature: specs/333-restore-create-ux-final-productization/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No application implementation is included in the preparation artifacts.
  • Focused on operator value, safety, proof visibility, and product workflow needs.
  • All mandatory repository sections are completed.
  • The spec preserves TenantPilot/TenantAtlas terminology and route/context language.

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
  • Success criteria are measurable.
  • Acceptance scenarios are defined for each primary user story.
  • Edge cases are identified.
  • Scope is clearly bounded to Restore Create UX productization.
  • Dependencies and assumptions are identified.

Constitution / Guardrail Alignment

  • Spec Candidate Check is filled and passes SPEC-GATE-001.
  • UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are filled for the changed wizard surface.
  • Proportionality review explicitly rejects new architecture, persisted truth, enum/status families, and backend rewrites.
  • RBAC, workspace/environment isolation, proof semantics, OperationRun UX impact, and provider-boundary impact are addressed.
  • Test governance and validation lanes are explicit.

Feature Readiness

  • spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and restore-create-state-contract.md exist.
  • Tasks are ordered, small, verifiable, and implementation-ready.
  • Required screenshot artifacts path is present.
  • Close alternatives and follow-up specs are kept out of scope.

Notes

  • Preparation analysis should re-check that no task requires a backend rewrite, new presenter, migration, package, or new Product Process Flow architecture.
  • Implementation must update spec/plan before runtime work if repo truth differs from skip behavior, item-level selection, proof-link availability, or group picker context assumptions.