ahmido
0987527d0e
## Summary - add persisted customer review acknowledgement truth with capability gating and audit emission - extend the customer review workspace with acknowledgement state, evidence basis details, and accepted-risk lifecycle visibility - add focused feature and browser coverage plus Spec 343 screenshot artifacts and UI audit updates ## Scope - Livewire v4 / Filament v5 surface only; no panel provider changes - no new global assets; no `filament:assets` deployment change for this slice - includes a PostgreSQL migration for `environment_review_acknowledgements` ## Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage - reachable UI surface changed: existing `/admin/reviews/workspace` customer-safe page - UI audit updated in `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md` - screenshot artifacts included under `specs/343-customer-review-attestation-accepted-risk-lifecycle/artifacts/screenshots/` - spec package includes plan, tasks, repo-truth map, and state contract for the implemented slice ## Notes - target branch requested: `platform-dev` - branch pushed from commit `aaaad441fd13dbac54e971ab48765c502ced6b3f` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #415
53 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 343 - Customer Review Attestation & Accepted Risk Lifecycle
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Validate Spec 343 preparation completeness before implementation.
|
||
**Created**: 2026-06-01
|
||
**Feature**: `specs/343-customer-review-attestation-accepted-risk-lifecycle/spec.md`
|
||
|
||
## Candidate Selection Gate
|
||
|
||
- [x] CHK001 The selected candidate is directly provided by the user as Spec 343 (next step after Spec 342).
|
||
- [x] CHK002 The candidate aligns with current roadmap direction: governance-of-record customer-safe reviewability without a generic GRC rebuild.
|
||
- [x] CHK003 No existing `specs/343-*` package or branch was found before Spec Kit creation.
|
||
- [x] CHK004 Related specs were checked for completed-spec signals and are treated as context only (326, 329, 337, 342).
|
||
- [x] CHK005 Close alternatives are deferred rather than hidden scope (344–347 follow-up candidates).
|
||
- [x] CHK006 Scope is narrowed to one strategic surface (`/admin/reviews/workspace`) and one minimal persisted truth addition (acknowledgement) only if missing.
|
||
|
||
## Content Quality
|
||
|
||
- [x] CHK007 `spec.md` defines problem, user value, functional requirements, non-goals, acceptance boundaries, assumptions, risks, and open questions.
|
||
- [x] CHK008 `plan.md` lists likely affected repo surfaces and separates repo-truth mapping from runtime changes.
|
||
- [x] CHK009 `tasks.md` is ordered into small phases with explicit test/browser/screenshot/validation tasks.
|
||
- [x] CHK010 Supporting prep artifacts exist: `repo-truth-map.md` and `review-attestation-risk-state-contract.md`.
|
||
- [x] CHK011 No unresolved template placeholders remain in `spec.md`, `plan.md`, or `tasks.md`.
|
||
|
||
## Constitution And Scope
|
||
|
||
- [x] CHK012 Proportionality review is present and explicitly rejects a generic attestation/GRC framework.
|
||
- [x] CHK013 Persistence is justified via PERSIST-001 for acknowledgement truth (auditable governance-of-record event).
|
||
- [x] CHK014 Workspace/environment isolation and deny-as-not-found semantics are explicit requirements.
|
||
- [x] CHK015 UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed for the strategic customer-safe surface.
|
||
- [x] CHK016 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture, panel provider location, destructive-action confirmation rules, asset strategy, and testing plan are explicit.
|
||
|
||
## Plan Quality
|
||
|
||
- [x] CHK017 Plan sequencing is repo-truth gate → persistence decision → service/audit → UI wiring → tests/browser → validation.
|
||
- [x] CHK018 Deployment/ops impact is explicit (migration possible; no env/queue/scheduler/assets expected).
|
||
- [x] CHK019 No Graph/provider calls during UI render are enforced by plan constraints.
|
||
|
||
## Task Quality
|
||
|
||
- [x] CHK020 Tasks include concrete repo surfaces and avoid inventing runtime paths beyond likely touch points.
|
||
- [x] CHK021 Tasks include Feature/Livewire tests and one bounded Browser smoke (strategic surface).
|
||
- [x] CHK022 Tasks include screenshot artifacts and “unreachable state” handling without faking backend truth.
|
||
- [x] CHK023 Tasks explicitly forbid rewriting completed specs and forbid legal/compliance claim scope creep.
|
||
|
||
## Spec Readiness Gate
|
||
|
||
- [x] CHK024 `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` exist.
|
||
- [x] CHK025 Required supporting prep artifacts exist in the spec package.
|
||
- [x] CHK026 Open questions do not block safe implementation because each is resolved via repo-truth-first tasks before runtime changes.
|
||
- [x] CHK027 Scope is bounded enough for a later implementation loop.
|
||
- [x] CHK028 Result: ready for implementation loop.
|
||
|