Implements platform feature branch `358-operationrun-queue-truth-foundation`. Target branch: `platform-dev`. Follow-up integration path after merge: `platform-dev` -> `dev`. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #429
3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
Requirements Checklist: Spec 358 - OperationRun Queue Truth Foundation
Purpose: Preparation analysis for Spec 358 readiness
Created: 2026-06-06
Feature: specs/358-operationrun-queue-truth-foundation/spec.md
Candidate Selection And Guardrails
- CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided draft plus repo-verified current code truth.
- CHK002 No
specs/358-*package existed before this prep. - CHK003 Related historical specs are treated as context only: 149, 160, 233, 268, 270, and 272.
- CHK004 The selected slice is narrow and reviewable: generic queue-truth alignment only, with no new persistence or adapter framework.
- CHK005 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in
spec.md.
Required Prep Artifacts
- CHK006
spec.mdexists and contains no template placeholders. - CHK007
plan.mdexists and is repo-aware. - CHK008
tasks.mdexists and is ordered, small, and verifiable. - CHK009 This checklist exists.
Spec Quality
- CHK010 Spec Candidate Check is completed.
- CHK011 The spec keeps
OperationRuntruth derived-only and does not introduce new persisted lifecycle state. - CHK012 The spec clearly separates current repo reconciliation truth from the user's broader future-framework wording.
- CHK013 The spec states clear goals, non-goals, requirements, risks, and acceptance criteria.
- CHK014 The proportionality review rejects a new queue-health subsystem or adapter registry by default.
Plan / Task Alignment
- CHK015 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change.
- CHK016 The plan explicitly preserves existing scheduled and adapter reconciliation commands as out-of-scope context.
- CHK017 The plan keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider-registration location visible.
- CHK018 The tasks include tests-first work and explicit runtime validation commands.
- CHK019 The task list keeps scope bounded and includes anti-creep guardrails against persistence or framework expansion.
UI / Monitoring Coverage
- CHK020 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim no-impact.
- CHK021 The changed surfaces are correctly classified as existing monitoring family follow-through, not a new strategic customer surface.
- CHK022 No new page-report identity or route-inventory expansion is required for this bounded monitoring-family wording fix.
- CHK023 Audience-aware disclosure and no-overclaim wording boundaries are explicit.
Test Governance
- CHK024 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Unit plus focused Feature.
- CHK025 No broad new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced.
- CHK026 Planned validation commands are explicit and file-scoped.
Readiness Gate Outcome
- CHK027 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
- CHK028 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
- CHK029 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
- CHK030 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.
Review Outcome
- Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
- Workflow outcome: keep
- Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry
Guardrail / Smoke Coverage - Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based artifact review checklist; no standalone local
speckit.analyzecommand was available in this repo surface - Tooling note: the repo-generated branch number advanced to
1000, and localsetup-plan.shrejected that 4-digit prefix; the final prep artifacts were therefore authored manually under the user-requested358package without changing application runtime code