ahmido
252cd4513d
Implemented report evidence reconciliation. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #432
65 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Spec 361 - Report and Evidence Reconciliation Adapters
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Preparation analysis for Spec 361 readiness
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-06
|
|
**Feature**: `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/361-report-evidence-reconciliation/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection And Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided Spec 361 draft from the attached `pasted-text.txt`.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/361-*` package existed before Spec Kit branch creation.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 The active candidate queue's `no safe automatic next-best-prep target` note is respected; this package is an intentional manual promotion, not an auto-selected queue item.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 Related specs were checked and treated correctly: Spec 358 is queue-truth context, Spec 359 is merged adapter baseline, Spec 360 is canonical-cutover context, and Specs 347/349/351/356/357 are review-pack or rendered-report context only.
|
|
- [x] CHK005 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in `spec.md`, especially the narrowed safe scope around `EvidenceSnapshot` and `ReviewPack` plus the explicit defer/fail-closed treatment for generic `StoredReport` families.
|
|
|
|
## Required Prep Artifacts
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK006 `spec.md` exists and contains no template placeholders.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
|
|
- [x] CHK008 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
|
|
- [x] CHK009 This checklist exists.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK010 Spec Candidate Check is completed and scores above the approval threshold.
|
|
- [x] CHK011 The spec keeps `OperationRun`, `EvidenceSnapshot`, `ReviewPack`, and `StoredReport` persistence unchanged.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 The spec explains why bounded adapter extension is justified now under ABSTR-001: the repo already has real adapter-backed reconciliation consumers.
|
|
- [x] CHK013 The spec keeps scope bounded to evidence reconciliation, review-pack reconciliation, and honest unsupported generic report-family handling.
|
|
- [x] CHK014 The proportionality review rejects a generic report-artifact engine, new operation types, new persistence, and weak "latest artifact exists" heuristics.
|
|
|
|
## Plan / Task Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK015 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change, including the current registry, write seam, artifact models, artifact-truth presenters, and operations/detail pages.
|
|
- [x] CHK016 The plan keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider-registration location visible.
|
|
- [x] CHK017 The plan explicitly states that no migration, no new panel/provider, no new global search change, and no new asset strategy are expected.
|
|
- [x] CHK018 The tasks start with repo truth and failing tests before runtime edits.
|
|
- [x] CHK019 The tasks include explicit anti-creep guardrails against new persistence, new operation types, generic stored-report heuristics, and rendered-report scope creep.
|
|
|
|
## UI / Monitoring / Artifact Coverage
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK020 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim a new page family.
|
|
- [x] CHK021 The changed surfaces are correctly classified as existing operations monitoring/detail plus existing artifact detail follow-through, not a new strategic customer-facing page.
|
|
- [x] CHK022 No new page-report identity or route-inventory expansion is required unless implementation proves a materially new visible hierarchy.
|
|
- [x] CHK023 Audience-aware disclosure and no-overclaim wording boundaries are explicit for both operations and artifact detail surfaces.
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK024 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Unit + Feature + one bounded Browser smoke.
|
|
- [x] CHK025 No heavy-governance family or PGSQL-only schema lane is introduced by default.
|
|
- [x] CHK026 Planned validation commands are explicit, partitioned into primary merge gate and contextual artifact regressions, and remain scoped to Spec 361 plus directly adjacent evidence/review-pack coverage.
|
|
|
|
## Readiness Gate Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK027 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK028 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK029 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
|
|
- [x] CHK030 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep
|
|
- [x] Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`
|
|
- [x] Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based cross-artifact review; no standalone local `speckit.tasks` or `speckit.analyze` generator command was exposed in this repo surface beyond prompts and agent instructions
|
|
- [x] Tooling note: Spec Kit branch/spec creation succeeded via `create-new-feature.sh`, `setup-plan.sh` generated the plan file, and `tasks.md` plus this checklist were authored manually to match the repo's Spec Kit templates and agent instructions
|