549a9a0004
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 1m0s
Implemented the output contract and readiness semantics for review packs. Also added spec 348. Includes changes to ChooseEnvironment, CustomerReviewWorkspace, GenerateReviewPackJob and related blade views. Added comprehensive tests.
69 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Spec 347 - Review Pack Output Contract & Readiness Semantics
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Preparation analysis for Spec 347 readiness
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-02
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/347-review-pack-output-contract-readiness-semantics/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection And Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided Spec 347 draft plus roadmap/spec-candidate alignment.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/347-*` package existed before this prep.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 Related completed specs are treated as historical context only: 109, 308, 312, 337, 342, 343, and 344.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 Active Spec 346 is treated as adjacent context only and is not rewritten or normalized by this prep.
|
|
- [x] CHK005 The selected slice is narrow and reviewable: output contract, readiness semantics, workspace wording, tests, and disclosure only.
|
|
|
|
## Required Prep Artifacts
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK006 `spec.md` exists and contains no placeholder template sections.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
|
|
- [x] CHK008 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
|
|
- [x] CHK009 `repo-truth-map.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK010 `contracts/review-pack-output-contract.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK011 `contracts/readiness-semantics.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 `contracts/customer-safe-output-boundary.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK013 This checklist exists.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK014 Spec Candidate Check is completed.
|
|
- [x] CHK015 The spec distinguishes repo truth from the user draft, including the current `sections/` file layout and the existing `auditor_ready_executive_export.v1` contract.
|
|
- [x] CHK016 The spec states clear goals, non-goals, requirements, risks, assumptions, and acceptance criteria.
|
|
- [x] CHK017 The spec keeps readiness semantics derived-only and forbids new persisted readiness truth by default.
|
|
- [x] CHK018 The spec includes a proportionality review for the possible bounded readiness mapper.
|
|
|
|
## Plan / Task Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK019 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change.
|
|
- [x] CHK020 The plan explicitly preserves signed-download safety.
|
|
- [x] CHK021 The plan explicitly keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider registration location visible.
|
|
- [x] CHK022 The task list includes tests-first work and explicit runtime validation commands.
|
|
- [x] CHK023 The task list keeps scope bounded and includes non-goal guardrails against portal/rewrite/persistence creep.
|
|
|
|
## UI / Productization Coverage
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK024 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim no-impact.
|
|
- [x] CHK025 UI/Productization Coverage is completed for the existing strategic customer-safe workspace surface.
|
|
- [x] CHK026 The plan and spec point to the existing UI audit page report `ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md` instead of inventing a new identity.
|
|
- [x] CHK027 Audience-aware disclosure and no-false-ready/certification boundaries are explicit.
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK028 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Feature plus one bounded Browser smoke.
|
|
- [x] CHK029 New test file paths are specified.
|
|
- [x] CHK030 Existing Review Pack and Customer Review Workspace regression commands are included.
|
|
- [x] CHK031 No broad new heavy-governance family is introduced.
|
|
|
|
## Readiness Gate Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK032 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK033 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK034 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
|
|
- [x] CHK035 Recommended next step is implementation, not additional prep.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep
|
|
- [x] Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`
|
|
- [x] Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based artifact review checklist; no standalone local `speckit.analyze` command was available in this repo surface
|