TenantAtlas/specs/233-stale-run-visibility/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 6fdd45fb02
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 53s
feat: surface stale active operation runs (#269)
## Summary
- keep stale active operation runs visible in the tenant progress overlay and polling state
- align tenant and canonical operation surfaces around the shared stale-active presentation contract
- add Spec 233 artifacts and clean the promoted-candidate backlog entries

## Validation
- browser smoke: `/admin/t/18000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000180` -> stale dashboard CTA -> `/admin/operations?tenant_id=7&activeTab=active_stale_attention&problemClass=active_stale_attention` -> `/admin/operations/15`
- verified healthy vs likely-stale tenant cards, canonical stale list row, and canonical run detail consistency

## Notes
- local smoke fixture seeded with one fresh and one stale running `baseline_compare` operation for browser validation
- Pest suite was not re-run in this session before opening this PR

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #269
2026-04-23 15:10:06 +00:00

1.3 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Operation Run Active-State Visibility & Stale Escalation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-23 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated after initial draft creation.
  • No clarification markers remain.
  • Candidate promoted and removed from the open Qualified list in docs/product/spec-candidates.md.