1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Commercial Entitlements and Billing-State Maturity
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and readiness before planning or implementation. Created: 2026-04-28 Feature: ../spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Review Outcome
- Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
- Workflow outcome: keep
- Test-governance impact is explicitly recorded in the spec
Notes
- Repo-specific surface names and existing product terms are used to anchor the spec to current truth, but the spec does not prescribe languages, frameworks, APIs, or low-level implementation design.
- No open clarification markers remain. The bounded assumptions are the default
active_paidresolution for unset workspaces and the distinctgracebehavior that freezes onboarding expansion without blocking in-scope review-pack starts. - Implementation close-out keeps the workflow outcome as
keep. The Livewire browser-smoke finding was fixed inside scope by making workspace route resolution accept Livewire serialized workspace parameters; no follow-up spec is required.