ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
61feb48d8a
TenantAtlas/specs/255-enforce-finding-creation-invariants/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido ab9c36f21e
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 59s
Details
Automatische PR: platform-dev → dev (#299) 
Automatisch erstellt: Merge `platform-dev` into `dev` (via MCP)

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #299
2026-04-29 12:37:48 +00:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Enforce Creation-Time Finding Invariants

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-29
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • Repo-specific classes, routes, file paths, and validation commands appear only where they are required to keep the three active writer families and proof obligations unambiguous
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for product and review stakeholders, with repo-grounded detail only where the bounded invariant target would otherwise stay ambiguous
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria stay outcome-oriented even though the package names concrete writer families and proof files needed to bound the slice
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No unbounded implementation plan leaks into the specification; repo-specific commands and paths stay limited to selection, dependency, and validation context

Test Governance Review

  • Lane fit is explicit: the package uses fast-feedback and confidence, with the three writer suites as the primary proof and only bounded recurrence, consumer, and trigger-authorization regressions where FR-255-005, FR-255-006, FR-255-009, and FR-255-011 require them.
  • No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; adjacent proof remains inside existing feature suites only.
  • Suite-cost outcome stays bounded and reviewable: the package reuses existing writer, recurrence, consumer, and auth suites without adding a new default-heavy harness.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • Workflow outcome: keep
  • Review-note location is explicit: guardrail, lane-fit, and bounded-proof notes live in spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and this checklist.

Notes

  • Repo-surface names, validation commands, and current writer/test anchors are intentionally present because this prep package must distinguish the three active finding writers from already-completed adjacent cleanup specs.
  • The spec remains behavior-first: write-time lifecycle readiness, recurrence identity, reopen truth, and unchanged RBAC/tenant isolation are the product outcomes; repo details only keep the package reviewable and bounded.
  • No blocking open question remains for safe planning.