2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Drift MVP (044)
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to implementation Created: 2026-01-12 Feature: specs/044-drift-mvp/spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) (spec.md contains scenarios/rules/states/acceptance only)
- Focused on user value and business needs (spec.md: Purpose, User Scenarios, Acceptance Criteria)
- Written for non-technical stakeholders (spec.md uses plain language; avoids code/framework terms)
- All mandatory sections completed (spec.md includes Purpose, User Scenarios, Rules, Acceptance Criteria)
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (spec.md: no "[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]" markers)
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous (spec.md: Rules + Acceptance Criteria)
- Success criteria are measurable (spec.md: Acceptance Criteria)
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) (spec.md: Acceptance Criteria)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined (spec.md: Scenario 1/2/3)
- Edge cases are identified (spec.md: blocked state; error state; acknowledgement per comparison)
- Scope is clearly bounded (spec.md: Rules → Coverage (MVP))
- Dependencies and assumptions identified (spec.md: Rules → UI states; Run tracking)
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria (spec.md: Rules + Acceptance Criteria)
- User scenarios cover primary flows (spec.md: Scenario 1/2/3)
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria (spec.md: Acceptance Criteria are measurable and testable)
- No implementation details leak into specification (spec.md avoids implementation and names a generic “persisted run record” only)
Notes
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before
/speckit.clarifyor/speckit.plan. - Constitution gate: this checklist must exist for features that change runtime behavior.