## Summary - add a shared tenant lifecycle presentation contract and referenced-tenant adapter for canonical lifecycle labels and helper copy - align tenant, chooser, onboarding, archived-banner, and tenantless operation viewer surfaces with the shared lifecycle vocabulary - add Spec 146 design artifacts, audit notes, and regression coverage for lifecycle presentation across Filament and onboarding surfaces ## Validation - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Badges/TenantStatusBadgeTest.php tests/Unit/Badges/TenantBadgesTest.php tests/Unit/Tenants/TenantLifecycleTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Tenants/TenantLifecyclePresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantLifecyclePresentationAcrossTenantSurfacesTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/ReferencedTenantLifecyclePresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantLifecycleStatusDomainSeparationTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantViewHeaderUiEnforcementTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/TenantLifecyclePresentationCopyTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/OnboardingDraftAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/OnboardingDraftLifecycleTest.php` ## Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance preserved; this change is presentation-only on existing Filament v5 surfaces. - Panel provider registration remains unchanged in `bootstrap/providers.php`. - No global-search behavior changed; no resource was newly made globally searchable or disabled. - No destructive actions were added or changed. - No asset registration strategy changed; existing deploy flow for `php artisan filament:assets` remains unchanged. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #175
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Central Tenant Status Presentation
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-16
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation passed on the first review pass.
- Required constitution-alignment sections remain scope statements rather than implementation plans.
- No clarification questions are required before
/speckit.plan.