ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
6f8eb28ca2
TenantAtlas/specs/181-restore-safety-integrity/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido a107e7e41b feat: restore safety integrity and queue slide-over (#210) 
## Summary
- add the Spec 181 restore-safety layer with scope fingerprinting, preview/check integrity states, execution safety snapshots, result attention, and operator-facing copy across the wizard, restore detail, and canonical operation detail
- add focused unit and feature coverage for restore-safety assessment, result attention, and restore-linked operation detail
- switch the finding exceptions queue `Inspect exception` action to a native Filament slide-over while preserving query-param-backed inline summary behavior

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Monitoring/FindingExceptionsQueueTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/RestoreSafetyIntegrityWizardTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/RestoreResultAttentionSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/RestoreLinkedOperationDetailTest.php tests/Unit/Support/RestoreSafety`

## Notes
- Spec 181 checklist is complete (`specs/181-restore-safety-integrity/checklists/requirements.md`)
- the branch still has unchecked follow-up tasks in `specs/181-restore-safety-integrity/tasks.md`: `T012`, `T018`, `T019`, `T023`, `T025`, `T029`, `T032`, `T033`, `T041`, `T042`, `T043`, `T044`
- Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is preserved, no panel provider registration changes were made, no global-search behavior was added, destructive actions remain confirmation-gated, and no new Filament assets were introduced

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #210
2026-04-06 23:37:14 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Restore Safety Integrity

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-06
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-04-06.
  • The spec keeps constitution-mandated surface, route, and capability references, but avoids code-structure or file-level implementation design.
  • No clarification markers were required; scope, constraints, and acceptance boundaries are explicit enough to move directly into planning.