ahmido
712576c447
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 44s
## Summary - add the new admin findings intake queue at `/admin/findings/intake` with fixed `Unassigned` and `Needs triage` views, tenant-safe filtering, claim flow, and continuity into tenant finding detail and `My Findings` - add Spec 222 artifacts (`spec`, `plan`, `tasks`, `research`, `data model`, `quickstart`, contract, checklist) and register the new admin page - fix follow-up regressions uncovered during full-suite validation around findings action-surface declarations, findings list default columns, provider-blocked run messaging, operation catalog aliases, and workspace overview query volume ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsIntakeQueueTest.php tests/Feature/Authorization/FindingsIntakeAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsClaimHandoffTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact` ## Notes - Filament remains on v5 with Livewire v4-compatible patterns - provider registration remains unchanged in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - no new assets or schema changes are introduced Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #260
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Intake & Team Queue V1
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-21
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation passed on 2026-04-21 in the first review iteration.
|
|
- The repository template requires route, authorization, and surface-contract metadata; the spec still avoids code-level implementation, language, and architecture detail beyond those mandatory contract fields.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain, so the spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`. |