TenantAtlas/specs/223-astrodeck-website-rebuild/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 71f94c3afa
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 44s
spec: finalize 223 AstroDeck rebuild planning consistency (#262)
## Summary
- finalize Spec 223 planning artifact set for AstroDeck website rebuild
- align `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `research.md`, `data-model.md`, `quickstart.md`, and contract schema
- add/complete inventory, mapping, exception, drift-follow-up, and supersession artifacts
- mark legacy website-spec task references as superseded and wire follow-up ownership

## Key Outcomes
- no remaining cross-artifact consistency findings in the Spec 223 bundle
- explicit Spec 213 handling path added
- material-drift follow-up rules normalized
- exception register and documented exception model made explicit and schema-backed

## Validation
- Integrated browser smoke check passed for main website routes (`/`, `/product`, `/trust`, `/changelog`, `/contact`, `/privacy`, `/imprint`, `/legal`, `/security-trust`)
- no console errors/warnings observed during route smoke navigation
- YAML contract parses successfully

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #262
2026-04-22 07:52:32 +00:00

1.3 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Website Reset and AstroDeck Rebuild

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-22
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation round 1 passed.
  • The spec stays local to apps/website and defines no runtime or platform obligations.
  • Existing website spec references were aligned to the current repository set: Specs 213, 214, 215, 217, and 218.