ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
742d65f0d9
TenantAtlas/specs/225-assignment-hygiene/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 12fb5ebb30
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 1m20s
Details
feat: add findings hygiene report and control catalog layering (#264) 
## Summary
- add the workspace-scoped findings hygiene report, overview signal, and supporting classification service for broken assignments and stale in-progress work
- add Spec 225 artifacts and focused findings hygiene test coverage alongside the new Filament page and workspace overview wiring
- align product roadmap and spec candidates around the layered canonical control catalog, CIS library, and readiness model
- extend SpecKit constitution and templates with the XCUT-001 shared-pattern reuse guidance

## Notes
- validation commands and implementation close-out notes are documented in `specs/225-assignment-hygiene/plan.md` and `specs/225-assignment-hygiene/quickstart.md`
- this PR targets `dev` from `225-assignment-hygiene`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #264
2026-04-22 12:26:18 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Assignment Hygiene & Stale Work Detection

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-22
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Repository spec governance intentionally requires route, RBAC, and surface-contract metadata; the spec avoids code-level implementation choices and keeps the feature framed around operator workflow, trust, and bounded scope.
  • Validation pass completed on 2026-04-22 with no open clarification markers.