ahmido
a2a42d4e5f
## Summary - add the complete Spec 196 artifact set for hard Filament nativity cleanup - include spec, requirements checklist, plan, research, data model, logical contract, quickstart, and executable tasks - update agent context after planning - resolve all cross-artifact consistency issues so the feature package is implementation-ready ## Included artifacts - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/spec.md - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/checklists/requirements.md - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/plan.md - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/research.md - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/data-model.md - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/contracts/filament-nativity-cleanup.logical.openapi.yaml - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/quickstart.md - specs/196-hard-filament-nativity-cleanup/tasks.md ## Notes - no runtime code paths were changed - no application tests were run because this change set is spec and planning documentation only - the artifact set was re-analyzed until no consistency issues remained Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #231
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Hard Filament Nativity Cleanup
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-13
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validated after initial draft on 2026-04-13.
- Framework-specific language appears only where the feature itself and constitution require naming the native admin contract; the spec does not prescribe code-level implementation choices, new abstractions, or dependency changes.
- No clarification questions were required from the user because scope, non-goals, and acceptance expectations were already explicit.