ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
7541b1eb41
TenantAtlas/specs/202-governance-subject-taxonomy/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 7541b1eb41 Spec 202: implement governance subject taxonomy and baseline scope V2 (#232) 
## Summary
- introduce the governance subject taxonomy registry and canonical Baseline Scope V2 normalization and persistence
- update baseline profile Filament surfaces, validation, capture/compare gating, and add the optional scope backfill command with audit logging
- add focused unit, feature, Filament, and browser smoke coverage for save-forward behavior, operation truth, authorization continuity, and invalid-scope rendering
- remove the duplicate legacy spec plan under `specs/001-governance-subject-taxonomy/plan.md`

## Verification
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Browser/Spec202GovernanceSubjectTaxonomySmokeTest.php`
- focused Spec 202 regression pack: `56 passed (300 assertions)`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- no schema migration required
- no new Filament asset registration required
- branch includes the final browser smoke test coverage for the current feature

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #232
2026-04-13 15:33:33 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Governance Subject Taxonomy and Baseline Scope V2

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-13
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation completed in one pass.
  • No clarification markers remain in the specification.
  • The spec keeps platform vocabulary, rollout strategy, and Intune no-regression behavior explicit while avoiding a broader plugin or model-generalization framework.