ahmido
7d4d607475
## Summary - add baseline compare evidence gap detail modeling and a dedicated Livewire table surface - extend baseline compare landing and operation run detail surfaces to expose evidence gap details and stats - add spec artifacts for feature 162 and expand feature coverage with focused Filament and baseline tests ## Notes - branch: `162-baseline-gap-details` - commit: `a92dd812` - working tree was clean after push ## Validation - tests were not run in this step Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #192
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Enterprise Evidence Gap Details for Baseline Compare
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-24 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation pass completed on 2026-03-24.
- Spec intentionally covers both canonical Monitoring → Operation Run Detail and tenant-scoped Baseline Compare review because operators move between both surfaces during the same investigation flow.
- No clarification blockers remain; spec is ready for /speckit.plan.