TenantAtlas/specs/260-governance-service-packaging/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Governance-as-a-Service Packaging v1

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and repo fit before planning
Created: 2026-05-01
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• No implementation details leak into the feature contract beyond repo-real route and surface references needed for local convention fit
• The spec is focused on user value, trust, sellability, and behavior rather than an implementation diff
• The spec is written so non-technical stakeholders can understand the product outcome and scope boundaries
• All mandatory sections requested by the repo template and constitution are completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Success criteria are measurable
• Success criteria are technology-agnostic enough to validate product outcome rather than code shape
• All acceptance scenarios are defined
• Edge cases are identified
• Scope is clearly bounded
• Dependencies and assumptions are identified

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• User scenarios cover the primary packaging flows
• The feature stays on one bounded on-demand package for one released review context
• The spec explicitly depends on the shared customer-safe interpretation layer and forbids bypassing it
• The roadmap phrase open decisions is narrowed to repo-real exception or risk-acceptance governance decision truth
• No new panel, package domain, report engine, schedule, or campaign system is introduced
• Existing review, review-pack, evidence, and stored-report surfaces remain the reuse path

Test Governance

• Planned validation stays bounded to focused confidence coverage plus one explicit browser smoke
• The spec reuses existing review, tenant-review, review-pack, and evidence test families instead of introducing a new heavy family
• Reviewer handoff and minimal proof commands are explicit

Notes

• Reviewed against docs/product/spec-candidates.md, docs/product/roadmap.md, docs/product/implementation-ledger.md, specs/257-governance-decision-convergence/spec.md, specs/258-customer-review-productization/spec.md, specs/259-compliance-evidence-mapping/spec.md, and .specify/memory/constitution.md on 2026-05-01.
• No application implementation was performed while preparing this spec.

Review Outcome

• Outcome class: repo-fit-ready
• Outcome: keep
• Reason: The spec stays narrowly on one management-ready package over existing released-review truth, explicitly records the interpretation dependency, narrows the ambiguous open decisions phrase to repo-real governance decision truth, and avoids introducing a second package domain.
• Workflow result: Ready for /speckit.plan