TenantAtlas/specs/231-finding-outcome-taxonomy/checklists/requirements.md
Ahmed Darrazi 807578dd9c
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 4m16s
feat: implement finding outcome taxonomy
2026-04-23 09:24:59 +02:00

1.5 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Finding Outcome Taxonomy & Verification Semantics

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-22
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated in one pass. No open clarification markers remain.
  • The spec keeps the existing findings lifecycle and scopes the change to one bounded outcome taxonomy plus verification semantics; no new queue, entity, or status family is introduced.
  • Repo-required constitution and surface-guardrail references are treated as product governance constraints, not implementation design leakage.