ahmido
bd06b479e1
## Summary - add the Spec 220 governance run diagnostic summary seam and wire it through the canonical operation run detail presenter - render summary-first decision guidance for covered governance run families while keeping technical diagnostics secondary - add focused Pest coverage, spec artifacts, and complete the integrated-browser smoke validation for canonical run detail ## Testing - cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent - cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Monitoring/GovernanceOperationRunSummariesTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/OperationRunBaselineTruthSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/ArtifactTruthRunDetailTest.php tests/Feature/Authorization/OperatorExplanationSurfaceAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/RunAuthorizationTenantIsolationTest.php tests/Unit/Support/OpsUx/GovernanceRunDiagnosticSummaryBuilderTest.php tests/Unit/Support/OperatorExplanation/OperatorExplanationBuilderTest.php - integrated browser smoke pass on localhost:8081 covering summary-first hierarchy, zero-output runs, multi-cause runs, cross-family parity, workspace-wide visibility, and deny-as-not-found tenant safety Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #257
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Humanized Diagnostic Summaries for Governance Operations
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-20
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass 1 complete.
|
|
- Required surface-governance metadata such as routes and action-matrix references are present, but the spec avoids implementation mechanics, framework instructions, and code-level solution design. |