ahmido
81bb5f42c7
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 55s
## Summary - add the canonical admin-plane `My Findings` inbox at `/admin/findings/my-work` - add the workspace overview `Assigned to me` signal and inbox-to-detail continuity - add focused Pest coverage plus the full Spec 221 artifact bundle ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings/MyWorkInboxTest.php tests/Feature/Authorization/MyWorkInboxAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Dashboard/MyFindingsSignalTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/WorkspaceOverviewNavigationTest.php` - integrated-browser smoke completed against the browser-facing `tenantatlas` runtime, including seeded positive-path and negative-path checks plus fixture cleanup ## Filament v5 Guardrails - Livewire v4.0+ compliant - panel provider registration remains in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - global search behavior is unchanged; `FindingResource` already has a View page and the new inbox is a custom page, not a searchable resource - no destructive actions were introduced on the inbox or overview signal - no new assets were added; the existing deploy step for `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` remains unchanged - coverage includes the new inbox page, authorization boundaries, the workspace overview signal, and the overview CTA regression Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #258
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Operator Inbox V1
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-20
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated after initial spec drafting on 2026-04-20.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain.
|
|
- Candidate ledger was cleaned for the two findings candidates that are now specced as Spec 219 and Spec 221. |